e-Claire

A Post Millennial Consideration of Our Interconnection
by a simple tootsie from The Countryâ„¢...




If comments are closed, please email me: Claire AT e-biscuit DOT com




MAIN PAGE HERE





Dept. of Secret Messages

Quote meon an estimate et non interruptus stadium. Sic tempus fugit esperanto hiccup estrogen. Glorious baklava cheesecake ex librus hup hey yo ho ho ad infinitum. Non sequitur as usual, condominium facile et geranium incognito. Hoo-Ah! Betcha didn't know that!

Stuff by the Month

Most Recent Stuff

Syndicate

This page has been viewed 3062774 times

Referrers

Powered by ExpressionEngine

Useful Phrase

this one courtesy of MoM

It all depends whose ox is being gored.

via Drudge "The Kerry campaign calls on a publisher to 'withdraw book' written by group of veterans, claiming veterans are lying about Kerry's service in Vietnam and operating as a front organization for Bush. Kerry campaign has told Salon.com that the publisher of UNFIT FOR COMMAND is 'retailing a hoax'... 'No publisher should want to be selling books with proven falsehoods in them,' Kerry campaign spokesman Chad Clanton tells the online mag...

heh. Too late -- I got mine today. The Mister's take: "When Kerry says, 'Bring it on,' all I see is a lousy poker player." UPDATE in progress: O.M.G. [also via Drudge:

In a statement, the Kerry campaign said it had "filed a legal complaint against Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (SBVT) before the Federal Election Commission (FEC) for violating the law with inaccurate ads that are illegally coordinated with the Bush-Cheney presidential campaign." The complaint asks that the Republican National Committee, Bush's reelection campaign, and the veterans group "be enjoined from further violations, be required to repay their illegal contributions and be fined the maximum amount permitted by law."

The Bush response?

"I do think that Senator Kerry losing his cool should not be an excuse for him to lash out at the president with false and baseless attacks," McClellan said.

Is this a foot-shot? If he pushes it, he'll have to prove that the ads are actually "inaccurate." Or is he betting on finding a judge who will issue a temporary restraining order to stop the ads until the case is settled? At which point he'll wander off, drop the case "until aafter the election" and never be called to prove the truth of his claims? Would that even be legal? See what you get when you run a coupla lawyers for anything 'cept out of town on a rail?!?

Posted by Claire on 08/20 at 10:47 AM

<< Back to main

Ponderables




moon phases
 




Fighting Fusileers -- Donate ! !

image

Site Meter