e-Claire

A Post Millennial Consideration of Our Interconnection
by a simple tootsie from The Countryâ„¢...




If comments are closed, please email me: Claire AT e-biscuit DOT com




MAIN PAGE HERE





Dept. of Secret Messages

Quote meon an estimate et non interruptus stadium. Sic tempus fugit esperanto hiccup estrogen. Glorious baklava cheesecake ex librus hup hey yo ho ho ad infinitum. Non sequitur as usual, condominium facile et geranium incognito. Hoo-Ah! Betcha didn't know that!

Stuff by the Month

Most Recent Stuff

Syndicate

This page has been viewed 3060541 times

Referrers

Powered by ExpressionEngine

Obama Small Donor Base = Horse Hockey

shock and *yawn*

Everybody knows [ok - right off, that phrase blows credulity clean outta the water] how President-elect Barack Obama’s amazing campaign money machine was dominated by several million regular folks sending in hard-earned amounts under $200, a real sign of his broadbased grassroots support.

Except, it turns out, that’s not really true.

In fact, Obama’s base of small donors was almost exactly the same percent as George W. Bush’s in 2004—Obama had 26% and the great Republican satan 25%. Obviously, this is unacceptable to current popular thinking.

But wait—there’s more!

...reported throughout the campaign, only 26% of Obama’s contributions through last August and only 24% through Oct. 15 came from people whose total donations added up to less than $200.

The key word there being “total.”

It comes down to which definition of “small donor” you accept:

Someone who donated to the Obama campaign by scraping together $199, period.

Or someone who donated $199 to the Obama campaign several times, perhaps totaling close to the $4,600 legal limit for the primary and general elections.

Not counting the donations made by Person O.R. Personsunknown whose donations added up to $187,000 or more but, because the security software had been disabled, were allowed to donate under phony names with non-existant addresses using throw-away, pre-paid cards from Parts Unknown.

But that’s not important, now.  Right?

"After a more thorough analysis of data from the Federal Election Commission (FEC),” the CFI study says, “it has become clear that repeaters and large donors were even more important for Obama than we or other analysts had fully appreciated."

Nice work. 
[/sarc]

Patterico

Posted by Claire on 11/30 at 09:16 AM

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

<< Back to main

Ponderables




moon phases
 




Fighting Fusileers -- Donate ! !

image

Site Meter