Interesting...
showdown
Although Stewart is right accusing Cramer if acting “dewey-eyed innocence,” he portrays an assumed naiveté as though that were the correct norm. I mean srsly; I’m no financial whiz [though I do listen to Jerry Doyle] and even *I* know that there are two ways to go about the Market. Long term or short. And that the short term Market has all sorts of arcane, byzantine facets that, if you’re not hip-deep in it, it’s best to stay the hell away from. Long term [ generational] is a bet on the continuing growth of America—short term is an n-dimentional roulette wheel.
But that’s not important, now…
This is part 2—apparently Parts 1 and 3 aren’t ready yet [?!?] or are otherwise unavailable… Maybe later [links at Part 2]
OR *clicky*clicky*
So Cramer can run a financial advice show, and he’s trashed because he doesn’t bat 1000 - and somebody like Keith Olbermann and (who’s the other guy?) can run a news show - one that only presents the hard-core liberal agenda, and that’s OK?
Posted by ZZMike on 03/13/09 at 11:02 AM
Next entry: Living Language
Previous entry: Bubbling Up
