Good Company
birds of a feather and all that...
*clicky*clicky*
[iddn’t that one o’ those things ya buy—like a star on the Hollywood sidewalk?]
or an Oscar?
There’s only one problem with that Peace Prize nomination (outside of the obvious how-dumb-can-they-be):
Here’s what Alfred Nobel’s will said about it:
“According to Nobel’s will, the Peace Prize should be awarded “to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between the nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses”.
Somebody else wil have to figure out how Gore’s stumping for GW fits in to that.
Another little problem. This is from the Nobel Prize website:
“Observing the rules given in the statutes of the Nobel Foundation, the Committee does not publish the names of candidates.
The nominators are strongly requested not to publish their proposals.”
You don’t think there’s anything political about this Mr Brende character, do you? The rest of the Committee - the official Committee - mnay want to have a word or two with him.
Posted by ZZMike on 02/02/07 at 10:36 AMWe’re so sorry, Uncle Albert! He’s STILL eating donuts and drinking iced-tea, and reflecting on how he did NOT carry his home state of Tennessee and Bill Clinton’s home state of Arkansas in the 2000 presidential elections! The Sorelosermans don’t want YOU to KNOW that all they had to do was win Tennessee OR Arkansas - and the Oral, er, Oval Office was theirs! Why? Because the electoral votes in TENN or ARK would have clinched the election, and F L O R I D U H ‘S
25 electoral votes wouldn’t have mattered! No recount would have been required! Bring on the GOREONS Again in 2008 - PLEASE DO!Posted by on 02/04/07 at 02:25 AM
Next entry: Sharia Law
Previous entry: Robert Spencer Explains
